Site icon NJTODAY.NET

Pentagon fails fourth financial audit

For the fourth year in a row, the Defense Department failed its annual financial audit but the Pentagon claims that it is making progress while Congress is giving the war machine more money than ever. 

The 2022 defense budget is $753 billion, up $12 billion from 2021 and much greater than the Cold War average of $575 billion or President Obama’s final military spending plan of just over $600 billion.

According to the U.S. Congressional Budget Office, military outlays will rise to $915 billion by 2031.

The U.S. national defense budget, which does not include disbursements for the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Homeland Security, constitutes nearly 40 percent of global military spending.

The Defense Department’s inspector general and independent public accounting firms conducted the fiscal 2021 audit, which covered the department’s more than $3.2 trillion in assets and $3 trillion in liabilities.

About 1,200 auditors did 278 in-person and 1,069 virtual site visits.  According to Bloomberg’s Anthony Carpaccio, the Department of Defense made $35 trillion in “accounting adjustments” in 2019, a total that’s larger than the entire U.S. economy.

“Although we do not yet have a clean opinion and we have a long way to go, I will note that over this past decade we have done what we have told the Congress we would do when we said we would do it,” said Michael McCord, the chief financial officer. “We believe we’ve made steady progress in unmodified opinions achieved or expected to be achieved from several of our standalone audits that cover approximately 37% of our total assets.” 

However, McCord said, “as expected, the overall department got a disclaimer of opinion on our consolidated financial statement,” which means the auditor has no opinion on the financial statements. This could be for a variety of reasons. 

The Defense’s Department’s annual financial report for fiscal 2021 contains information on the audit, among other things. 

“Of the 26 standalone audits, six reporting entities received unmodified opinions (i.e., auditors determined the financial statements were presented fairly and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles), one reporting entity received a qualified opinion (i.e., auditors concluded there were misstatements or potentially undetected misstatements that were material, but not pervasive to the financial statements), and 17 reporting entities received disclaimers of opinion,” said the report. “The standalone audits for two reporting entities, the DoD [Inspector General’s Office] and the Defense Information Systems Agency Working Capital Fund, are scheduled to conclude in December 2021.”

Auditors also use material weaknesses, which are deficiencies in internal controls, and notices of findings and recommendations to measure progress, which the Defence Department “continues to monitor,” said the report. 

The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) released its annual financial report in mid-November. The report included the fourth consecutive “disclaimer” (flunk) audit opinion from the DoD Office of Inspector General. The DoD, with more than $3 trillion in reported assets, is one of the main reasons that the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has delivered a disclaimer of opinion on the overall financial statements of the federal government of the United States – every year since 1997. 

In recent years, the DoD Office of Inspector General (OIG) has delivered a valuable supplementary report, titled “Understanding the Results of the Audit of the DOD Financial Statements.”

That is used by financial watchdog group Truth in Accounting to develop an annual DoD Audit Report Card, which evaluates and ranks the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, and 14 other Pentagon components on their audit performance.

Last year, Thomas Harker, then-Navy top budget official who was also performing the duties of Defense Department comptroller, said he didn’t expect the Pentagon to achieve a clean audit until 2027. On the call with reporters on Monday, McCord neither firmly agreed nor disagreed with that timeline projection.

He said in a statement that he has “no doubt…we will reach our goal of achieving an unmodified audit opinion.” He also lauded his organization for its role “supporting other department-wide high-visibility [fiscal] 2021 objectives including, transitioning administrations, supporting our troops and the nation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and withdrawing our troops and Afghan allies from Afghanistan.” 

The Defense Department has an annual expenditure of about $800 billion, so the approximately $207 million cost of the audit—which represents .03% of expenditures for the year— is a “highly positive investment in transparency, accountability and efficiency for the American people,” said a fact-sheet from the department. 

“I was glad to see that areas critical to supporting our men and women in uniform such as civilian pay, military pay, and the military retirement fund passed their audits, but the fact remains that we have much work to do,” said Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin III, in a statement. “Make no mistake: none of us at the department are content with the overall results of this audit. But we are committed to learning from it and to doing better. We must work harder to institute stronger internal controls and prove in every way that we are being good stewards of taxpayer dollars.” 

The financial watchdog group Truth in Accounting has issued reports on the past three audits. 

Following their most recent analysis, published in March, Bill Bergman, Truth in Accounting’s director of research, told Government Executive, “They are making progress in the sense that they’re finding more problems than they resolve.” 

Last year, a group of senators introduced bipartisan legislation that would require the Pentagon to pass a full, independent audit by fiscal 2022. Any department component that failed to do so would have to return 1% of its budget to the Treasury Department to help with deficit reduction. Lawmakers in the House introduced a similar version in July. Neither bill has been voted on yet. 

Exit mobile version