The FBI recently released its 2021 national crime data estimates and, as expected, the takeaway is far from conclusive. On Oct. 5, 2022, the FBI released its annual report on crime in the United States for 2021, just as it has done for more than 90 years.
In short: The nation’s most thorough crime data collection program concluded it’s possible crime went up, went down or stayed the same.
That’s partly because the year-on-year changes to the numbers were small.
The FBI’s crime statistics for 2021 confirm that violence continued to be a significant problem in the United States, but the bright note is that such crimes remained at or near the 2020 level instead of spiking upwards as they had during the Trump administration.
The FBI estimates that murders rose by about 4% compared to 2020, while overall violent crime decreased by about 1%. Officials cautioned that neither change is statistically significant, and concluded that crime rates were roughly flat.
The uncertainty largely stems from the fact that 2021’s data was more incomplete than any in recent memory. Comprehensive FBI data depends on law enforcement agencies’ voluntary submissions. This year about 7,000 police agencies covering about 35% of the U.S. population, were missing from a total of about 18,000 law enforcement entities in America.
Why? Last year, the bureau phased out a nearly century-old data-collection platform and began accepting data only through a newer system — the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS).
The feds for years had announced the change was coming, but many agencies did not switch in time to submit data, including the New York City Police Department and Los Angeles Police Department — the nation’s two largest.
Some entire states, including California and Florida, sent virtually no data. To make up for the data holes, the Justice Department created new estimation methods that use data from agencies that did submit to the FBI to fill in the blanks for the rest of the country.
In some cases, the FBI didn’t even have enough information to make an estimation. Here are a few examples of what the FBI could not include in its 2021 crime report:
- State-level violent crime estimations for eight states: California, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, New Mexico and Pennsylvania. In several of these states, crime is a hotly contested issue in the midterm election.
- The number of violent crimes, murders, and aggravated assaults for the West.
- The number of violent crime victims who are Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander.
This problem could persist for years, as upgrading reporting systems has proven expensive and complicated for police agencies. The Los Angeles Police tried for years and had to start from scratch.
The San Francisco Police Department previously told The Marshall Project that they don’t plan to send crime data to the FBI until 2025.
Even if every agency sent the numbers to the FBI, it’s important to remember that what we typically think of as “crime data” is not a neutral measure. Individual enforcement decisions by police departments can make some crimes seem more or less common.
There are also numerous examples of police intentionally manipulating numbers, as Ethan Corey notes for The Appeal.
And then only about half of violent crime victims ever report it to the police, according to the latest crime victimization survey that the Justice Department released earlier this fall.
Despite these limitations, it’s not all bad news. The FBI’s new system provides much more detailed data than the old form of reporting, and tells us things it never could before. For example, the FBI estimates roughly 80% of murders reported to the police in 2021 were committed with firearms — something that the old data system couldn’t capture. The new system will also include the demographics of crime victims, and the arrest rate for crimes. Even though only 65% of law enforcement agencies submitted data under the new system to the FBI this year, that number has doubled over the past decade.
But as long as the reporting rates remain low, data analyst Jeff Asher reminds us that “properly expressing uncertainty about what’s happening” is more important.