Disgraced former President Donald Trump was convicted on 34 counts in his New York hush money trial but he still faces 54 charges in three other criminal indictments and his legal team is working to prevent the presumptive Republican nominee from having to go to trial.
Former President Donald Trump was convicted on Thursday by a New York jury on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal money paid to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels in 2016, aiming to prevent her from speaking publicly about a sexual encounter she claims they had years earlier. This conviction, however, is just one of the many legal obstacles Trump faces. Across three other cases, he faces an additional 54 criminal charges. These cases relate to his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election and the handling of classified documents after leaving the White House. Trump has denied any wrongdoing in all cases, and trial dates have yet to be scheduled.
Overview of Trump’s Legal Challenges:
| Case | Number of Charges |
|---|---|
| Georgia 2020 Election Case | 10 |
| January 6 Election Case | 4 |
| Classified Documents Case | 40 |
Breakdown of Charges
Georgia 2020 Election Case
- Total Charges: 10
- Racketeering: 1 count
- Forgery or False Statements and Documents: 8 counts
- Soliciting or Impersonating a Public Officer: 1 count
The Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney charged Trump and 18 others in connection with efforts to reverse his 2020 election loss in the state. Initially indicted on 13 charges, three were dismissed, all related to alleged pressure on state officials to change the election result. The district attorney has filed an appeal against this dismissal.
The most significant charge is the violation of Georgia’s anti-racketeering law, alleging that Trump and others formed a criminal enterprise to overturn the election results. The remaining counts involve the plot to appoint fake electors and the false voter-fraud claims.
January 6 Election Case
- Total Charges: 4
- Conspiracy to Defraud the U.S. Government: 1 count
- Conspiracy Against Civil Rights: 1 count
- Obstruction: 2 counts
Federal prosecutors are investigating the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol and Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. Trump and his alleged co-conspirators are accused of plotting to reverse the election results and obstructing the certification of Joe Biden’s win. The conspiracy charges encompass the various methods allegedly used to achieve this goal, while the obstruction charge pertains to the attempt to stop Congress from certifying the election results.
Classified Documents Case
- Total Charges: 40
- Willful Retention of National Defense Information: 32 counts
- False Statements: 2 counts
- Obstruction, Withholding, or Altering Documents: 6 counts
Federal prosecutors charged Trump with illegally retaining classified documents from his presidency and conspiring to cover up these actions. Each of the 32 counts of willful retention corresponds to a different classified document, some containing sensitive military intelligence. The other charges involve Trump’s alleged attempts to hide these documents from investigators and delete security footage at his Mar-a-Lago residence.
Potential Penalties
The most substantial federal counts Trump faces relate to obstruction, punishable by up to 20 years in prison. However, defendants rarely receive the maximum sentence. Trump’s recent conviction in New York, related to falsifying business records, will see him sentenced on July 11. The outcome of this case may influence the handling of his other legal battles, but it remains uncertain whether he will face incarceration.
As Trump continues to navigate these legal challenges, the political and legal implications remain significant. His conviction in New York is only the beginning, with three more trials pending on charges that could further impact his political future.
Each case reflects broader questions about the accountability of a former president and the legal boundaries of executive power.
Attorney General Merrick Garland has faced criticism for not charging Trump with obstruction of justice, despite detailed findings in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigative report.
Mueller’s report, released in 2019, outlined multiple instances where Trump potentially obstructed justice during the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
The investigation produced 37 indictments; seven guilty pleas or convictions; and compelling evidence that the president obstructed justice on multiple occasions. Mueller also uncovered and referred 14 criminal matters to other components of the Department of Justice.
The Mueller Report states that if the Special Counsel’s Office felt they could clear then-President Trump of wrongdoing, they would have said so. Instead, the document explicitly states that it “does not exonerate” him.
However, Mueller refrained from indicting Trump because a Department of Justice (DOJ) policy stated that a sitting president cannot be criminally charged. Critics argue that Garland, as the current Attorney General, has neglected his duty by not pursuing these charges once Trump left office.
A statement signed by over 1,000 former federal prosecutors concluded that if any other American engaged in the same efforts to impede federal proceedings the way Trump did, they would likely be indicted for multiple charges of obstruction of justice.
Mueller’s report identified several actions by Trump that could constitute obstruction of justice, including:
- Attempts to Remove the Special Counsel: Trump directed White House Counsel Don McGahn to have Mueller removed, which McGahn refused.
- Efforts to Influence Witnesses: Trump attempted to influence witnesses, such as offering potential pardons to individuals like Paul Manafort, Michael Cohen, and Michael Flynn, all of whom were involved in the investigation.
- Discouraging Cooperation with the Investigation: Trump publicly and privately discouraged his associates from cooperating with the investigation.
- Direct Interference with Investigations: Trump attempted to limit the scope of the investigation and pressured then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to unrecuse himself and curtail Mueller’s investigation. The report raised questions about whether Trump, by and through his private attorneys, floated the possibility of pardons to influence the cooperation of fired National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, and another unnamed person with law enforcement.
Mueller’s report explicitly stated that it did not exonerate Trump and left the determination of whether the president committed a crime to Congress and future prosecutors.
By not charging Trump, Mueller adhered to the DOJ policy regarding sitting presidents, but since this policy does not apply once a president leaves office Garland could have indicted Trump for these actions once he was no longer in the Oval Office.
Critics argue that Garland’s decision not to charge Trump undermines the principle that no one is above the law. By not pursuing charges, they claim, Garland is allowing Trump to escape accountability for actions that would likely lead to prosecution for any other individual.
The failure to charge Trump contributes to a perception that powerful individuals can evade justice, thereby eroding public trust in the legal system and the DOJ’s commitment to impartial enforcement of the law. Delays on investigating the defeated Republican also set back timetables so much that the remaining 54 counts against Trump might never get to juries.
By not acting on Mueller’s findings, Garland set a dangerous precedent that future presidents can obstruct justice without facing consequences, which could encourage similar or worse behavior that can weaken the integrity of both the presidency and the justice system.
Discover more from NJTODAY.NET
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.