Site icon NJTODAY.NET

Anti-abortion extremists are the second group of terrorists Trump pardoned

Anti-abortion activists rally during the annual March for Life

Following his clemency grant to terrorists involved in his failed coup attempt on January 6, 2021, President Donald Trump pardoned 23 anti-abortion criminals who were convicted of blocking access to reproductive health clinics and intimidating staff and patients.

Trump announced the clemency grants in an Oval Office signing ceremony on the eve of the 52nd annual March for Life in Washington, days after pardoning more than 1,500 terrorists involved in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.

Those pardoned include Lauren Handy, Paula “Paulette” Harlow, Jean Marshall, Joan Bell, John Hinshaw, William Goodman, Jonathan Darnel, Heather Idoni, Paul Vaughn, Coleman Boyd, Dennis Green, Paul Place, James Zastrow, Eva Edl, Eva Zastrow, Chester Gallagher, Calvin Zastrow, Joel Curry, Justin Phillips, Christopher Moscinski, Bevelyn Williams, Herb Geraghty and Jay Smith.

As thousands of anti-abortion crusaders attended the 52nd annual March for Life in Washington, D.C., on Friday, Jan. 24, Republicans dished out government action to curry favor with the religious zealots who want to impose their version of morality on the nation.

Trump, who cemented the conservative U.S. Supreme Court majority that overturned Roe, he had signaled on at least three occasions before the election that he intended to pardon the anti-abortion criminals.

Trump also signed a memorandum to reinstate the Mexico City policy, which bans global health aid for foreign organizations that provide or promote abortions. The policy was first introduced during the second Reagan administration and has been rescinded by every Democratic president and reinstated by every Republican president since then. Trump previously restored the policy four days into his first term before President Biden rescinded it again a week into his own.

Trump also signed an executive order aimed at enforcing the Hyde Amendment, which has banned the use of any federal dollars on abortions since 1977. The order also rescinds a pair of Biden administration actions intended to expand access to abortion services after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

Republicans in Congress passed a redundant measure that would subject doctors and nurses to fines and up to five years in jail. Under current law, any baby who is born alive during an abortion must receive care from health care providers.

After Senate Democrats blocked the bill Wednesday, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said the proposal is a partisan “attack” on reproductive rights, medical professionals and American women.

“The bill we’re voting on today, the Republicans’ so-called Born Alive bill, is as pernicious as they come. It attacks women’s health care using false narratives and outright fear-mongering, and it adds more legal risk for doctors on something that is already illegal,” said Schumer.

A year after the Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision that ended the constitutional right to abortion, 62% of U.S. adults said the practice should be legal in all or most cases, while 36% said it should be illegal in all or most cases.

Since the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision eliminated the federal right to abortion in June 2022, getting an abortion has changed radically in many parts of the United States—most crucially for people in states that have banned or severely restricted abortion.

The Guttmacher said there were 930,160 abortions in all 50 states and the District of Columbia during 2020.

Anti-abortion extremists who have been considered a current domestic terrorist threat by the United States Department of Justice will benefit from a significant shift in the government’s approach to prosecuting violations of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, scaling back its efforts in cases involving demonstrators who interfere with patient access to reproductive health clinics.

The move aligns with directives from the Trump administration to address what it has characterized as the “weaponization” of federal law enforcement.

“It’s only been five days and Trump is already abusing his power, endangering patients and providers so he can push access out of reach,” said Reproductive Freedom for All President Mini Timmaraju. “This reckless action will open the floodgates to violence and harassment against people simply seeking the care they need. We must hold the Trump administration accountable for emboldening dangerous extremists and attacking our reproductive freedoms.”

Coleman Boyd, 53, who was among those pardoned on Thursday, said at the annual March for Life rally that Trump should support a national abortion ban, something he has said he would veto if such a law were to be passed by Congress.

“I’m very thankful that he pardoned us. I think he’s done lots of amazing things in the first week. I just think he is bad off on abortion,” said Boyd. “I think he is a horrible president when it comes to abortion.”

Boyd was one of six defendants convicted by a jury for federal civil rights offenses arising out of their blockade of a reproductive health care clinic in Mount Juliet, Tennessee, on March 5, 2021.

According to evidence presented at trial, Boyd, Chester Gallagher, Heather Idoni, Calvin Zastrow, Paul Vaughn and Dennis Green engaged in a conspiracy, and used physical obstruction to interfere with employees and stop at least one patient from receiving reproductive health services. 

“I want to make clear that this administration stands by you, we stand with you, and most importantly we stand with the most vulnerable and the basic principle that people exercising the right to protest on behalf of the most vulnerable should never have the government go after them ever again,” said Vice President JD Vance during a speech at the March for Life.

Since the 1970s in the United States, there have been at least 11 murders, 42 bombings, 200 arsons, and 531 assaults against abortion providers and patients.

In a memo issued by Chad Mizelle, the department’s new chief of staff, the Justice Department stated that FACE Act prosecutions would now be pursued only in “extraordinary circumstances” or cases involving “significant aggravating factors,” such as incidents resulting in death, serious bodily harm, or severe property damage.

The FACE Act, signed into law in 1994 by President Bill Clinton, protects access to reproductive health clinics by making it a crime for demonstrators to block entrances, damage property or threaten patients.

The United States has a long history of anti-abortion violence directed at both patients and providers but less severe conduct, Mizelle noted, could be handled by state or local authorities.

As part of this policy shift, the department dropped three pending FACE Act cases, including one involving a 2021 blockade of a Planned Parenthood clinic in Philadelphia. The case centered on an anti-abortion activist who barricaded himself inside a bathroom, causing the facility’s evacuation.

“President Donald Trump campaigned on the promise of ending the weaponization of the federal government and has directed all federal departments to identify and correct such practices,” Mizelle wrote in the memo. The announcement coincided with the annual March for Life rally in Washington, where thousands of anti-abortion demonstrators gathered, and came a day after Trump granted pardons to 23 individuals convicted of FACE Act violations during the Biden administration.

Among those pardoned were activists involved in a 2023 incident at the Washington Surgi-Clinic, where demonstrators reportedly pushed their way into the facility, injuring a nurse and harassing patients. Trump described the individuals as “peaceful pro-life protesters” and criticized the prosecutions as excessive.

The FACE Act, enacted in 1994, criminalizes efforts to block clinic entrances, damage property, or threaten patients or staff at reproductive health facilities. The law has been a focal point of debate, particularly in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision overturning Roe v. Wade. During the Biden administration, the Justice Department significantly increased prosecutions under the statute, drawing sharp criticism from Republican lawmakers who argued that the law was being misused to suppress free speech.

The policy change reflects a broader effort by the Trump administration to reexamine federal enforcement priorities. Proponents argue that scaling back FACE Act prosecutions will curb perceived overreach by federal authorities, while critics contend that it risks emboldening disruptive or violent conduct targeting clinics.

Prosecutions Under the FACE Act

Recent years have seen a range of cases brought under the FACE Act, including both criminal prosecutions and civil actions. Notable examples include:

Despite the decrease in federal prosecutions, reproductive health providers have emphasized the continued need for legal protections. Advocates warn that reduced enforcement could lead to increased harassment and violence at clinics, recalling the surge of anti-abortion violence in the late 20th century, when bombings, arson, and other attacks caused millions of dollars in damages and disrupted services nationwide.

Between 1977 and 1988, the U.S. experienced an epidemic of violence against abortion clinics, with 110 documented cases of arson, firebombing, or bombing. Vigorous investigation and prosecution of perpetrators eventually curbed the attacks, but the financial toll on clinics—estimated at $7.6 million—was substantial.

Proponents of the FACE Act argue that it remains a vital tool for ensuring safe access to reproductive health care, while opponents see its use as infringing on First Amendment rights. The Justice Department’s new policy is likely to deepen the divide over how best to balance free speech and public safety in this contentious arena.

As the debate continues, the decision underscores the evolving priorities of federal law enforcement and the enduring controversy surrounding reproductive health care in America.

Exit mobile version