Disney-owned ABC is taking late-night show “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” off the air following conservative backlash to comments made on air in the wake of right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk’s death.
On his show Monday, Kimmel said: “We had some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”
Tyler Robinson, the suspected assassin, was raised in an ideologically conservative household comprised of supporters of President Donald Trump, and he was exposed to gun culture at a young age. The 22-year-old defendant appears to have grown angry with what he described as Kirk’s “hatred” after forming a relationship with a transgender person.
Robinson is a product of his MAGA-aligned upbringing whose radicalization reveals a dark undercurrent within modern conservative America.
Raised in a deeply Republican household in Washington, Utah, Robinson and his parents—both registered Republicans and hunting license holders—were embedded in a close-knit, conservative Latter-Day Saint community. Though Robinson registered as nonpartisan, his upbringing was steeped in the very right-wing culture he later turned violently against.
His apparent turn against that world was not a rejection of conservatism, but a malignant evolution of it.
Governor Spencer Cox revealed that a family member stated Robinson had grown “more political in recent years,” and specifically called Kirk “full of hate.” This exemplifies that the movement’s combative rhetoric is ultimately directed at a figure from its own ranks.
The evidence points to a shooter immersed in the online culture of nihilistic grievance.
The bullet casings—engraved with phrases like “Hey fascist! Catch!” and memes such as “If you read this, you are gay LMAO”—are not the coherent manifesto of a structured ideology. Instead, they are the hallmark of the “black pilled” nihilism festering in online reactionary circles, where far-right, misogynistic, and anti-establishment sentiments blend into a cynical worldview.
This case mirrors other mass shooters who emanate from the digital subculture of alienated young men. Robinson’s path—from a quiet, church-going boy in a Republican family to an accused assassin—exemplifies how the violent, performative rhetoric tolerated within modern conservatism can curdle into real-world terror.
Luigi Mangione’s cousin, Nino Mangione, is a Republican Maryland state legislator who served as a Baltimore County co-chair for the state’s Trump Victory Leadership County team. Luigi’s social media comments show he’s very socially conservative and his paternal grandfather built a formidable business that made the family a force in local politics and charity.
Luigi would probably consider many of the people who appear to idolize him as a societal problem, while Robinson’s father’s career in law enforcement probably says all one needs to know about how his worldview was shaped.
Kimmel correctly asserted that the gunman was not an outsider to the right-wing movement, but rather its monstrous creation, a fact MAGA advocates want to suppress.
Of all the grotesque masks worn in the dismantling of American democracy, few are as cynically crafted as that of Brendan Carr, the Federal Communications Commission chairman.
Hailed by Donald Trump as a “warrior for Free Speech,” Carr has perfected the Orwellian art of weaponizing the very concept of liberty to silence it.
His orchestrated campaign that led to the suspension of Kimmel is not an anomaly; it is the blueprint. It is a stark warning that in an era of eroding norms, heightened violence, and the steady creep of tyranny, the last engines of scrutiny—the press and entertainment media—are being systematically dismantled for doing their job.
Carr’s background is a study in the modern path to power: a corporate lawyer for the wireless industry who seamlessly transitioned into a government regulator, his career is a monument to the revolving door between regulated and regulator.
His rise was not predicated on a fierce defense of the public airwaves but on a talent for echoing the grievances of his political patrons.
His prolific social media presence and Fox News appearances are not those of a disinterested public servant but of a partisan operative, a loyalist who hitched his star to Trump’s anger and Elon Musk’s wealth.
His chapter in the authoritarian Project 2025 playbook, which opens with the promise that the “F.C.C. should promote freedom of speech,” is the first clue to the bad faith that defines his tenure. In the Trumpian lexicon, “promoting freedom of speech” has always meant punishing speech that dares to dissent.
Since his ascension, Carr has wielded the gavel not as a guardian of the public interest but as a cudgel against it.
He has launched purges against diversity programs, slashed regulations for broadband giants, and, most ominously, reinstated politically motivated complaints against major networks that his predecessor had rightly dismissed as unconstitutional.
His modus operandi is a form of regulatory extortion: he links the fate of multi-billion dollar corporate mergers—like Paramount-Skydance—to a network’s willingness to kowtow to his political demands.
This is not governance; it is a shakedown. It is the raw exercise of power to compel obedience, proving that the rule of law has been supplanted by the rule of the whim.
The targeting of Jimmy Kimmel is the most transparent illustration of this campaign.
Kimmel’s crime was not lying, as Carr baselessly claims, but engaging in satire and scrutiny. He mocked the former president for his narcissistic response to an assassination and criticized a political movement for its exploitative rhetoric.
For this, he was branded a liar by the nation’s top communications watchdog, who then issued a naked threat on a right-wing podcast: act against Kimmel, or face “additional work for the F.C.C. ahead.”
The result was a capitulation by a terrified Disney, pulling a flagship show off the air “indefinitely.”
This is not the “easy way or the hard way”; it is the way of a petrified media ecosystem learning that criticism of power will be met with state-sanctioned retribution.
This incident is not isolated. It occurs within a terrifying national context: troops on city streets, attacks on academia and science, the weaponization of the Justice Department, and a president who sues news organizations into submission.
As government institutions fail one by one to act as bulwarks against tyranny, the independent press and satirical media become the most critical remaining check on power. They are an engine of accountability, and that is precisely why they are under attack.
The suspension of Kimmel is a message, echoed by the president himself as “Great News for America”: the engine will be dismantled.
The breathtaking hypocrisy is the point. The same administration and its allies, who for years postured as free speech absolutists railing against “cancel culture,” now openly celebrate a consequence culture orchestrated from the highest levels of government.
They demand people be fired for their speech, threaten the tax status of critical organizations, and muse about using RICO statutes—laws designed for mobsters—against protesters.
“You know it’s really bad when someone did blackface once and I’m over here saying he did not deserve to get fired,” wrote Skyler Higley, referring to sketches Kimmel did impersonating Black celebrities, for which he’s apologized.
“Jimmy Kimmel should have stuck to acceptable comments, like suggesting that homeless people be executed,” wrote liberal columnist Andy Borowitz, in an ironic reference to Fox News host Brian Kilmeade, who said mentally ill homeless people should get “involuntary lethal injection.”
They have abandoned any pretense of principle, revealing that their defense of free speech was never about liberty, but about power. It was only ever freedom for their speech.
Brendan Carr is no warrior for free speech.
He is a bureaucrat for autocracy. He provides a veneer of procedural legitimacy to what is essentially a political purge.
His actions demonstrate that when democratic norms collapse, the first casualty is truth, and the second is the free flow of information that allows a people to hold power accountable.
In the face of this assault, the choice is stark: succumb to the state’s demand for compliant silence, or recognize that the defense of satirists like Jimmy Kimmel is no longer about entertainment—it is about the defense of democracy itself.
Discover more from NJTODAY.NET
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.