Trump’s gun grab idea pits government in a war against itself

Following a nurse’s death, federal workers have demanded officials’ removal while rumors swirl that Homeland Security officials are drafting plans that would defy the Second Amendment.

In a move that resonates with the grim determination of a nation pushed to its brink, the collective voice of over 820,000 federal workers has sounded not as a request, but as a demand.

The American Federation of Government Employees has called for the immediate removal of two architects of the current order, Secretary Kristi Noem and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller.

This follows the death of Alex Pretti, an ICU nurse whose service in the trenches of our national crises stood in stark contrast to the gilded remove of those who make policy from afar.

The union’s statement is a moral indictment, suggesting that the philosophies espoused by these officials have consequences measured in human breath, and that Pretti’s may be among them.

Meanwhile, from the labyrinthine corridors where the gears of enforcement turn with a cold efficiency, unsettling reports emerge concerning the possible disarmament of citizens.

There is a quiet, systematic contemplation underway among the leadership of certain immigration agencies—agencies whose recent methods have, to a worried citizen, begun to wear an uncomfortably familiar, almost Gestapo-like sheen of unchecked authority.

The subject of their deliberation is as American as apple pie and yet as volatile as nitroglycerin: firearms.

The whispers suggest a series of recommendations being prepared for the administration, outlining the framework for what could be termed a massive gun grab.

The proposed mechanism is the direct application of military force to disarm segments of the population deemed, by the ever-shifting definitions of the moment, to be potential roadblocks to despotism.

Trump’s gambit is intended to disarm potential political adversaries and protesters, in stark contrast with the modest reforms advocated by Democrats who support common sense firearm regulations.

We are thus presented with a chilling portrait of a government at war with itself, and perhaps soon, with its own people.

On one hand, the very civil servants who keep the engine of state running demand the ouster of those they see as poisoning the well of public service with cruelty and ideology.

On the other, the most formidable instruments of that state are reportedly sketching blueprints to turn its force inward, to treat the exercise of a fundamental right as an act of insurrection waiting to be quashed.

One wonders if the death of a nurse and the plotting of a gun confiscation are truly separate stories, or merely different symptoms of the same profound sickness—a detachment from the compact of trust that must exist between a government and the governed.

Between the greedy plutocratic parasites that worship money and his evangelical religious zealots, Trump’s acolytes conduct themselves as if they’re on a mission from God.

They assume they have a mandate despite his razor thin margin of victory in the election.

That atrocious arrogance is driving Trump’s MAGA policies like a stake into the heart of his Second Amendment supporters in a sacrifice capable of bringing Goebbels’ heir Stephen Miller to orgasm.

The question now is not merely who will resign, but what remains of the republic if these shadows continue to lengthen across the land.


Discover more from NJTODAY.NET

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from NJTODAY.NET

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from NJTODAY.NET

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading