By James J. Devine
Donald Trump’s most dangerous political idea is also his simplest: An election is legitimate only when Donald Trump wins it.
Everything else follows from that premise.
The lies about voting machines. The pressure on state officials. The fraudulent-elector scheme alleged by federal prosecutors. The effort to persuade Vice President Mike Pence to interfere with the counting of electoral votes. The attempt to enlist the Justice Department in the campaign to overturn the 2020 election. The pressure on Georgia officials to change a result Trump had lost. The campaign to discredit mail voting. And now, back in possession of presidential power, another effort to bend the machinery of elections to his will.
These are not isolated controversies scattered across a turbulent political career. They form a pattern.
Trump has spent years attacking the fundamental bargain on which representative government depends: Candidates compete for power, citizens decide who gets it, votes are counted according to law, and the losers leave.
Trump has repeatedly challenged the last part.
The election he could not accept
The defining episode remains 2020.
Trump lost.
He did not merely lose according to journalists, Democrats or political opponents. States certified their results. Courts rejected challenge after challenge. Republican election officials defended their counts. Congress ultimately counted the electoral votes.
Yet Trump tried to remain in power.
A federal grand jury subsequently charged him with conspiring to defraud the United States, conspiring against Americans’ voting rights, obstructing an official proceeding and conspiring to obstruct that proceeding.
The indictment alleged something much more serious than a politician complaining about an election. Prosecutors accused Trump and his allies of attempting to reverse a lawful presidential election through deceit and pressure after being repeatedly told that their claims of outcome-changing fraud were false.
The indictment described pressure on state officials, fraudulent electoral certificates, efforts to manipulate the Justice Department and an extraordinary campaign to persuade Pence to interfere with the constitutional process for counting electoral votes.
When Pence refused, Trump turned up the pressure.
And when a mob attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, the peaceful transfer of presidential power was interrupted by violence for the first time in modern American history.
Trump has tried to transform that history into mythology.
But mythology does not erase evidence.
This was not simply a dispute about fraud
There is an important distinction between believing an election was stolen and attempting to overturn an election after the evidence says otherwise.
Trump was entitled to challenge results in court. He was entitled to demand recounts where the law permitted them. He was entitled to complain, protest and make arguments — even foolish arguments.
He was not entitled to manufacture votes.
He was not entitled to substitute illegitimate electors for legitimate ones.
He was not entitled to use knowingly false claims to pressure public officials into changing certified election results.
And he was not entitled to disenfranchise millions of Americans because they had committed the unforgivable offense of voting for somebody else.
Special counsel Jack Smith ultimately concluded that the evidence was sufficient to prosecute Trump for four felonies arising from what Smith described as an effort to retain power through fraud and deceit. After the Supreme Court’s presidential-immunity decision, another grand jury returned a superseding indictment based on conduct prosecutors regarded as prosecutable. The case was later dismissed after Trump won the 2024 election because of the Justice Department’s longstanding position that a sitting president cannot be federally prosecuted — not because a jury acquitted him or prosecutors concluded that the evidence was false.
That distinction matters.
Trump escaped a federal trial on those charges because he returned to the presidency before a jury could decide them.
That is not exoneration.
It is one of the strangest consequences of political power in American history.
The Georgia phone call
Nowhere was Trump’s contempt for electoral restraint more naked than Georgia.
On Jan. 2, 2021, Trump telephoned Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, as Trump sought to overturn Joe Biden’s victory in the state.
The conversation became infamous because Trump wanted officials to produce enough votes to reverse his defeat.
The significance of that episode is sometimes obscured by the endless arguments surrounding Trump. Strip away the personalities and partisan noise and consider what happened:
A sitting president who had lost a state pressured the official responsible for its elections while seeking precisely the number of votes necessary to turn defeat into victory.
Imagine Barack Obama doing it.
Imagine Joe Biden doing it.
Imagine a Democratic president calling a Republican secretary of state after losing and asking officials to change enough votes to keep the White House.
Republicans would properly call it an outrage.
It remains an outrage when Trump does it.
The fraudulent-elector scheme
Even more extraordinary was the effort involving alternate slates of electors.
Federal prosecutors alleged that Trump and his co-conspirators organized fraudulent electoral slates in seven states and attempted to transmit false certificates to Congress as part of the effort to overturn the election.
Consider what that means.
Millions of citizens voted.
Their states determined the winners.
The lawful electors were selected.
And then Trump allies allegedly attempted to construct an alternative paperwork reality in which the loser could be treated as the winner.
This was not a recount.
It was not litigation.
It was not political speech.
It was an alleged mechanism for overriding actual voters.
The ballots said one thing. The scheme sought to make the government recognize another.
That is the essence of election subversion.
January 6 was the consequence, not the beginning
Americans sometimes remember Jan. 6 as though it suddenly erupted from nowhere.
It did not.
The violence was preceded by weeks of falsehoods telling millions of Americans that their country had been stolen from them.
Trump summoned supporters to Washington while Congress was preparing to certify the election.
He continued insisting that Pence possessed authority Pence said he did not have.
Then the Capitol was breached.
Police officers were assaulted. Windows were smashed. Legislators fled. The electoral count stopped.
The federal indictment alleged that after Pence’s refusal became public and the Capitol came under attack, Trump and his alleged co-conspirators exploited the disruption by continuing efforts to delay certification.
The mob was eventually expelled.
Congress returned.
The votes were counted.
The Republic survived.
That should have ended Trump’s political career.
Instead, it became another test of how much an exhausted political system was willing to tolerate.
Yesterday’s lie becomes tomorrow’s machinery
The most dangerous mistake Americans can make is treating 2020 as ancient history.
Trump’s fixation on elections did not disappear when he returned to the White House. His administration has continued asserting federal authority over areas traditionally administered by states, including voter records and mail voting. The Justice Department has sued states seeking voter-registration records, while the administration has pursued changes affecting the handling of mailed ballots.
In September 2026, courts were again confronting Trump administration attempts to impose new restrictions on mail voting ahead of the midterm elections. An appeals court upheld a block on one such executive-order provision, and litigation over Postal Service rules reached the Supreme Court as ballots were beginning to move through the system.
This is what makes Trump’s record more alarming than the conduct of a politician who merely refuses to admit an old defeat.
He learned from 2020.
America should ask what lessons he learned.
A failed attempt to overturn an election can become a rehearsal.
The great inversion
Trump’s political genius has always included an extraordinary talent for inversion.
Investigate him, and the investigators are criminals.
Indict him, and prosecutors are conspirators.
Reject his election claims, and judges are corrupt.
Report inconvenient facts, and journalists are enemies.
Defeat him at the polls, and the election must have been rigged.
Under this logic, Trump can never legitimately lose because every institution capable of establishing his defeat becomes illegitimate the moment it does so.
That is not merely narcissism.
It is an authoritarian theory of government.
Democracy says authority flows upward from the people.
Trump’s theory reverses the current: legitimacy flows downward from him.
The election is legitimate if he says so.
The prosecutor is legitimate if loyal to him.
The judge is legitimate if ruling for him.
The news is legitimate if flattering him.
The Republican is legitimate if obedient to him.
The voter is legitimate if voting correctly.
Once that principle takes hold, elections cease to be instruments through which citizens choose leaders. They become ceremonies through which leaders demand ratification.
The conspiracy that matters
Trump has spent much of his political career warning Americans about conspiracies.
The deep state.
Rigged voting machines.
Corrupt election workers.
Illegal voters.
Dishonest prosecutors.
Disloyal Republicans.
Intelligence officials.
Judges.
Journalists.
Civil servants.
The list of supposed conspirators grows whenever reality becomes inconvenient.
But the most thoroughly documented conspiracy surrounding the 2020 election was the one a federal grand jury accused Trump himself of participating in: a conspiracy to defraud the United States and interfere with the lawful certification of an election he lost.
Trump denied wrongdoing and was never convicted on those federal election charges. That fact should be stated plainly.
So should another.
He was never acquitted of them.
The prosecution ended because Trump regained the office whose powers and protections placed him beyond the Justice Department’s reach while he remained president.
History therefore inherits a question that a jury never answered.
But citizens do not need a criminal conviction to judge political conduct.
The standard for entrusting someone with the presidency should be considerably higher than whether prosecutors can put him in prison.
Democracy cannot survive a permanent exception for one man
America has spent nearly a decade arguing about Trump as though the central question were whether he is conservative or populist, Republican or nationalist, vulgar or authentic.
Those arguments miss the point.
The essential question is whether one person may place his possession of power above the electorate’s right to withdraw it.
There is no democratic answer except no.
Not for Trump.
Not for a Democrat.
Not for anyone.
The peaceful transfer of power is not ceremonial etiquette. It is democracy’s enforcement mechanism. Elections mean nothing if the winner may govern but the loser may simply refuse the verdict.
That is why Trump’s behavior surrounding elections must never be normalized as ordinary partisan combat.
Taxes can be raised and lowered.
Regulations can be enacted and repealed.
Immigration laws can be tightened or liberalized.
Wars can end.
Treaties can be renegotiated.
But once political leaders establish that election results are binding only when convenient, the mechanism for correcting every other political mistake begins to disappear.
A ballot matters because the government agrees beforehand to obey it.
Trump has repeatedly demanded something different: that the ballot obey him.
That is the line Americans cannot afford to blur.
The ultimate danger is not that Donald Trump might steal one election.
It is that after years of accusations, pressure campaigns, fake-elector allegations, prosecutions, pardons, intimidation, attacks on mail voting and relentless repetition of the fiction that defeat itself proves fraud, Americans may become accustomed to the idea that elections are merely another battlefield on which anything is permissible.
That would be Trump’s greatest victory.
Not winning an election.
Teaching a democracy that losing one does not matter.
Discover more from NJTODAY.NEWS
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.